Jump to content

JanGaarni

Members
  • Posts

    298
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Legacy Profile Fields

  • INTERESTS
    force
  • LOCATION
    in a galaxy far far away

JanGaarni's Achievements

Community Regular

Community Regular (8/14)

  • First Post
  • Collaborator
  • Conversation Starter
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later

Recent Badges

0

Reputation

  1. No, I think that actually was aired on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart.
  2. Larger numbers increase, and lower decrease the size. Note: the star destroyers for instance have a value of 1.0, but fighters have a value of 0.7, etc... So they don't all have the same value. The Venator (marked as Jedi_Cruiser) is roughly the same size as the Victory, but has a scale factor value of 1.2, while the Victory has a scalefactor of just 1. Note 2: If you are going to change it, remember to change the ships' death clone value aswell so the blown up ship won't appear smaller (or larger depending which way you scaled them) as it explodes.
  3. You left out the 12 heavy turbolaser guns and 4 heavy Ion Cannons, half on the right side of the superstructer, the other half on the left (located where it says Ion Cannon Batteries in EaW, but they look different cause EaW is using the mkII model), 2 Quad Lasercannon Trench Batteries, and 3 triple barreled medium turbolaser turrets in front of the superstructure on the mkI. On the MKII the trench guns and triple barreled turrets are removed, and the 12 HTL guns and 4 Ion Cannons are replaced with 64 HTL guns, 32 on either side. Smaller caliber, but more independant of eachother.
  4. The TIE Avenger is the final product of the TIE Advanced x1. Looks alot like the x1, except they used almost the same wing configuration as they used on the TIE Interceptor (with cut outs so the pilot has a better view to the sides). Due to the extra cooling the system requires (it has shields and hyperdrives and thus needs a bigger reactor than the TIE/in) the wings are bigger and is identical at the rear to the front.
  5. The TIE Interceptor is also born out of the TIE Advanced x1 research. Just an FYI. The same powerunit, lasers, heat/solar panels, etc... comes from the TIE Advanced x1.
  6. The voice of Boba Fett in the latest OT edition ( : ai ai ai, where will this end?) has been replaced with Temuera Morrisons voice. And it is actually Temuera Morrisons voice you hear in the game. As for Veers' voice, the son of the actor playing him in ESB was the one who provided the voice for this game.
  7. Crap, I was logged off. Cain, you might want to turn off Guest posting.
  8. We have a Demo Button over at EmpireAtWar.net. Once Chris manages to upload it to us, it will be available. But you have to be a member to LucasForums.
  9. Is this the same Troops that was based on the TV show Cops? If so, it's an old, well made classic.
  10. Yes that is correct. Speaking of sizes The AT-AT is definatly not 50 meters tall, but it's not 20 meters either. It's 22. Yeah I know, small difference.
  11. Heh, Star Wars Tecnical Commentaries has stated the right lenght of the Executor since 1995. StarWars.com is just sloooow. Well, with the little I know, those sizes (except the Executor of course) looks about right. By the way, Cain, if you ever gonna up the size to the propper lenght, keep in mind the bridge tower dimensions is standarazid by Kuat. So it's the same size on an ISD, any of the other larger SD's, and SSD's.
  12. yeah I know.... why do people still call it the Imperator? Off-Topic: Because the Imperator name was the first used name to describe the class as far back as 1978 with the Mandel blueprints. Later second generation games and resource books mistakenly named it the Imperial Class, a mistake that has unfortunatly been stuck firmly in Star Wars literatur until recently. Curtis Saxton, who is running the Star Wars Technical Commentaries site since 1995, has been trying to get the truth out about the true name of the class, aswell as many other details about the Star Wars universe. Unfortunatly, the best he has been allowed to do is to come up with a way to explain why both names are correct when he wrote the Revenge of the Sith: Incredible Cross Sections book. And so the history of why the Imperator was renamed Imperial was born. But atleast, I, along with many others, now have propper official backing to justify using it, even though I'd rather see the Imperial-class "fallacy" being removed completely instead. Other things that has been repeated over and over and over for decades is the lenght of the Executor, which was stated to be only 8 km long, but in reality is 17.6 km long. It too has recently been corrected after years of missleading. But that's a whole nother story. On-Topic: I would rather having to build my Tie's, rather than have it the way it is now. But I'll survive.

Copyright (c) 1999-2022 by SWRebellion Community - All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters. Star Wars(TM) is a registered trademark of LucasFilm, Ltd. We are not affiliated with LucasFilm or Walt Disney. This is a fan site and online gaming community (non-profit). Powered by Invision Community

×
×
  • Create New...